elective-stereophonic
elective-stereophonic
Show Posts - xiahui135 singapore
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Latest Stable Nxt Client: Nxt 1.12.1 Upgrade before block 2870000 is mandatory!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - xiahui135

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
1
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Price speculation
« on: May 27, 2016, 02:44:54 pm »
the mgw asset own 5% of the instantDex share.
the instantdex asset own 50% of the instantDex share.

the two asset have the same amount, so the mgw should be 10% the instantdex asset price.

but now it is only 4%.  so one can get 2.5 times shares buying mgw not instantdex asset.

2
Nxt Community News and Announcements / Re: [ANN] Jinn
« on: May 27, 2016, 02:29:34 pm »
I think there should be a quarter report and annual report of this project.   

3
Consensus Research / Re: crypto777 - asset 13476425053110940554
« on: May 27, 2016, 02:26:51 pm »
when will the project be developed? after InstantDex?

4
If 2.0 abandon the current system and assets, I do not think there will be many users.
It take years to attract these people here.


从我的 iPhone 发送,使用 Tapatalk

5
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Proof of importance in NXT
« on: January 26, 2016, 04:24:09 pm »

The rich don't get richer, neither now nor when 1 NXT is at 1 USD. They just keep their percentage of forging power.
The ones who forge with time->oo, will end up owning all coins.
In general capital can create more capital, reflecting that productive goods can create even more productive goods...
So this is only natural though. And no, they will just end up with a bigger stake for servicing a blockchain which is a lot bigger then...
Support the idea of POI. Other factor need to be considered when forging.
We need people to guarantee the network, so the Internet bandwidth need to be considered.


从我的 iPhone 发送,使用 Tapatalk
I agree that network service from your node is also some type of investment that should be rewarded, though a doubt POI has a lot to do with that.
POW does not look at that factor neither, but also functions. And the big improvement of POS is that the coin holder doesn't get punished with huge inflation that pays for a useless pissing contest consuming more and more energy and constantly new hardware.
So nice try, trying to act as if you even know the POI algo, but once again:
How do you determine Proof of Importance?
Or in other words, what is the actual algo? And does the upload/download ratio of your node even get considered in POI?
The algorithm may be simple, but eventually we will make it good if optimizing it frequently.

6
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Proof of importance in NXT
« on: January 25, 2016, 03:59:40 pm »
Support the idea of POI. Other factor need to be considered when forging.
We need people to guarantee the network, so the Internet bandwidth need to be considered.


从我的 iPhone 发送,使用 Tapatalk

7
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Price speculation
« on: December 08, 2015, 12:42:01 pm »
Glad to see nxt start innovation again. the 1.7 is a good start.

8
Core Development Discussion / Re: New fees and size limits in 1.7
« on: November 22, 2015, 09:35:40 am »
It has been said several times that if the price goes significantly higher, we will do another poll and change the fee, just like we are doing now. Price was already 10x higher once, with the same fee, and it was not a problem. We do hard forks about every 6 months, if the price starts going solidly up we do have time to react, and in the worst case of very sudden price increase we will do another hard fork just to adjust the fees sooner.
Historically, NXT has been less volatile than other cryptocurrencies.
We just do not want another fork. It hurts.

9
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Can we vote whether lower the transaction fee?
« on: November 15, 2015, 03:53:27 am »
I hope everyone who cared about this thread is also aware of https://nxtforum.org/core-development-discussion/new-fees-and-size-limits-in-1-7/.

why not make the base fee changeable in the block-chain?
If nxt price go more than 10x higher, the fee is too high. We should prepare for the high price, not to limit the price to go high.

Before, the price is main determined by speculation when people just buy in a centralized exchange. Specutors do not care much about the transation fee, because it will not affect them much.
But we aim to make the price determined by application in future, if nxt will to success. Given this, we need to encourage usage of the our block chain, and lower fee make sense. the fee structure should be low enough, just to prevent abuse.

10
Core Development Discussion / Re: New fees and size limits in 1.7
« on: November 15, 2015, 03:52:50 am »
why not make the base fee changeable in the block-chain?
If nxt price go more than 10x higher, the fee is too high. We should prepare for the high price, not to limit the price to go high.

Before, the price is main determined by speculation when people just buy in a centralized exchange. Specutors do not care much about the transation fee, because it will not affect them much.
But we aim to make the price determined by application in future, if nxt will to success. Given this, we need to encourage usage of the our block chain, and lower fee make sense. the fee structure should be low enough, just to prevent abuse.

11
Are you already a member of the Supernet slack? If not please join sprnt.slack.com

What you propose is already well advanced, one of the SuperNet related projects is PAX that are pegged assets and currently in testing :)

Can you give me an invite?   email: xiahui135@gmail.com   thanks!
I know the pegged asset and industry solution project, once it is called crypto777. But there is little update here in the forum. What I propose, is to concentrate.

http://slackinvite.supernet.org/
Thanks!

12
Are you already a member of the Supernet slack? If not please join sprnt.slack.com

What you propose is already well advanced, one of the SuperNet related projects is PAX that are pegged assets and currently in testing :)

Can you give me an invite?   email: xiahui135@gmail.com   thanks!
I know the pegged asset and industry solution project, once it is called crypto777. But there is little update here in the forum. What I propose, is to concentrate.

13
There is no clear direction, and not much progress come out lately. We have not been enough professional in any field, like decentral exchange, crowdfunding, or smart contract.

I have a proposal to make us be more effective.

As the fund is limited, we should focus to solve one problem first, become professional in one field firstly. Though it need to think twice what to focus for the community. I just have a thought for you to discuss.

Asset Exchange is the core.
And There use to be some start-ups related to crypto come to get funded in this community. Though there is no new team coming, the Asset exchange is the most successful product for now. And it is most promising product, when combined with instantDEX tech.

multi-gateway is the bridge between the core and outside world.
The MGW make people can come into the Asset exchange. now there are only several crypto make use of MGW. If we let more partner come to join, the asset echange volume will be larger.

SuperNet is the door of outside partner
Supernet provide integration with partners, and create a win-win environment.

Pegged assets is the accelorator.
we can make fiat pegged assets, and we can provide stable currencies. This makes the asset exchange more operational. This also make people easier to deposit/withdraw when combined with MGW and Supernet.  (Not like bitshares' solution, which alway lead to low liquidity.)


Just my 2 nxt. Thanks for reading and welcome to add a comment.

14
Nxt Community News and Announcements / Re: [ANN] Jinn
« on: October 11, 2015, 02:30:03 pm »
The liquid is low now, so I just have bought a little Jinn. If It goes more clear and the liquid grows, I will consider buy more.
The risk and profit need to be consider together.

15
Nxt Community News and Announcements / Re: [ANN] Jinn
« on: September 20, 2015, 03:28:05 am »
Come-from-Beyond:


Quote from: John_Paul on Today at 04:30:37 PM
Even though you made them millionaires they will come back to ask more after they blow their fortunes.

What a funny coincidence, I'm planning to made them millionaires again. Check my post history next month to find the announcement thread if you want to watch this.


Jinn related? CFB looks pretty relaxed and posting alot more recently. Either Jinn has failed and he moved on or, by his comment here, he is confident in the progress of the venture.

Thoughts? Comments? CFB? Triangle?
what do you mean? Can you give more clear idea?

16
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Asset Exchange promotion - #1000assets
« on: September 19, 2015, 03:47:52 am »
1. Can you use instantDex tech? This will make trade faster.
2. Can the info UI be seperated from the trade UI? Most of time, i want to read the info and check the price. I need not to load the trade data once I open the page. This can make it faster.

3. Can a third-party comment on an asset? So people can choose better asset, and abanden rubbish.
We can choose good assets to be a special list. The thirdparty do work like nasdaq.
Yes, we're going to integrate InstantDEX at coinomat!
The other suggestions are interesting too, probably we would need some rating system built in NXT platform
This would be a great progress no other coin has
the rating system need not to be decetralised, though it is better to be.

A rating system which uses the Nxt Voting System is a good idea :)
and we need to consider whether everyone can vote,
or a third-party certifacate some assets and list them somewhere(like NASDAQ)

17
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Asset Exchange promotion - #1000assets
« on: September 18, 2015, 03:32:14 pm »
1. Can you use instantDex tech? This will make trade faster.
2. Can the info UI be seperated from the trade UI? Most of time, i want to read the info and check the price. I need not to load the trade data once I open the page. This can make it faster.

3. Can a third-party comment on an asset? So people can choose better asset, and abanden rubbish.
We can choose good assets to be a special list. The thirdparty do work like nasdaq.
Yes, we're going to integrate InstantDEX at coinomat!
The other suggestions are interesting too, probably we would need some rating system built in NXT platform
This would be a great progress no other coin has
the rating system need not to be decetralised, though it is better to be.

18
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Asset Exchange promotion - #1000assets
« on: September 17, 2015, 03:32:18 pm »
1. Can you use instantDex tech? This will make trade faster.
2. Can the info UI be seperated from the trade UI? Most of time, i want to read the info and check the price. I need not to load the trade data once I open the page. This can make it faster.

3. Can a third-party comment on an asset? So people can choose better asset, and abanden rubbish.
We can choose good assets to be a special list. The thirdparty do work like nasdaq.

19
So, will this be implemented in BTCD and BTCD only?
the peggy funds will be locked in the BTCD blockchain but NXT accounts will be able to be used directly to spend and trade them

so it is a new type of thing as it will exist in one blockchain, but spendable by accounts on another
is this a crypo777 program?

20
Trying costs. I think we need an idea, and try to prove it. If it is right, then focus on it and make something.

来自我的 MI NOTE LTE 上的 Tapatalk


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
elective-stereophonic
elective-stereophonic
assembly
assembly