elective-stereophonic
elective-stereophonic
Show Posts - digicoiner singapore
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Latest Nxt Client: Nxt 1.11.15

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - digicoiner

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Nxt Community News and Announcements / Re: [ANN] Jinn
« on: January 05, 2018, 06:35:24 pm »
I hope that means they haven't forgotten about this asset on the NXT blockchain. It could be a hidden gem if the JINN project is still active and the asset is still linked to the project.

2
Leasing & Pools / Re: Forkedchain's Ardor Forging Pool
« on: January 05, 2018, 06:09:41 pm »
Thanks for setting up this leasing service. How often will payouts occur and on what days?

3
Leasing & Pools / Re: Forkedchain's Ardor Forging Pool
« on: January 02, 2018, 11:44:29 pm »
Do I have to keep an Ardor node running once I start leasing?

4
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Ardor RasPi Forging
« on: January 02, 2018, 08:34:11 pm »
Are there any forging pools for Ardor?

5
Dear Nxt community,

Jelurida announces the Nxt Snapshot will happen on December 28th at block height 1636363. Please apologize for the delay of this announcement.
Thanks for your patience!
https://www.jelurida.com/ico

Just to cllarify: one Ardor asset will give us one Ardor token on the Ardor chain and one Jelurida monetary system token will give us one Ignis token on the Ignis chain. Is that correct?

6
Nxt Community News and Announcements / Re: [ANN] Jinn
« on: November 30, 2017, 08:02:25 pm »
I've now sold all my Jinn, partly because I was concerned about the lack of news here. I'd expected a statement about whether they intended to migrate their asset to the Ardor chain. I'm expecting Nxt to be all but dead after the snapshot.

I'm going to hang on a bit longer. Building a ternary processor is no difficult task. Maybe they've given up. All I ever saw was a video of some academic demoing a ternary processor. As I understood IOTA was supposed to be optimized to support ternary processors.

7
Nxt General Discussion / Re: IGNIS ICO
« on: September 29, 2017, 08:29:39 pm »
Will there also be persistent upward price pressure on Ignis  because of the constant fees paid to bundlers? Would there be a similar effect in Ardor?

8
Ardor General Discussion / Re: price speculation - IGNIS/ARDR
« on: September 18, 2017, 09:44:36 pm »
Which one is better to hodl? Is it better to hold more Ador as you can stake it? Is bundling Ignis worthwhile?

9
Nxt General Discussion / Re: IGNIS ICO
« on: September 12, 2017, 07:50:46 pm »
What is unique about the Ignis chain other than it is the first child chain of Ardor? Will it be unique from all other child chains?

10
Nxt General Discussion / Re: IGNIS ICO
« on: September 09, 2017, 07:07:25 am »
Yay, I was successful this time  :)

11
Thanks to the devs for the prompt fix.  However it still didn't help me. The problem I think I'm having is network latency issues on my node.  Can anyone recommend a VPS that might improve the chance my order transaction will reach the next forger?

12
Actually the description shows "IGINS" instead of IGNIS.

13
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Ignis Token Sale Progress
« on: August 09, 2017, 05:51:38 pm »
I put in 15 exchange orders (some with higher fees and some not)  a few minutes before the sale and not one was accepted :(
It looks like 8 accounts succeeded and around 650 failed. This ICO is massively oversubscribed, and the "first come first served" policy means that 99% of people are disappointed each round. The number of people trying is going down. People are giving up.

On the other hand, over 80 accounts have now been successful over the 8 offers. We'll probably have over 100 by the end of the first tranche, in two days. The winning accounts vary in size a lot - one bought just 170.

Still having no luck.  Maybe it would have been better if they offered JLRDA as an asset or provided an address to send NXT to (with limits) or all three options.  It might increase the distribution and give us a better chance of grabbing some cheap IGNIS.

14
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Ignis Token Sale Progress
« on: August 08, 2017, 07:09:23 pm »
I put in 15 exchange orders (some with higher fees and some not)  a few minutes before the sale and not one was accepted :(

15
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Ignis Token Sale Progress
« on: August 08, 2017, 01:15:00 am »
I've updated my client to the latest and submitted my order. Is preference given to when the order was submitted and will I increase my chances of the transaction being accepted if I increase the fee?
Fee affects whether you get into the block if there are more transactions than will fit in it. Once you are in, it's not supposed to affect the ordering.

It makes no difference when the order was submitted. What matters is arrival time at the node, and that depends on how soon the transactions reach your node, how quickly your node reacts, and then how quickly your transaction reaches the next forger. So it's mostly network delays, and it probably helps to be in the same country as the forger and/or the person who makes the offer. Also, phased transactions still have priority over non-phased.

This evening I think the offer happened in block 1428528, and the next 4 blocks have loads of transactions, so there may be some competition. However, the block itself does not look to be full, so network delays are more important. Quite a few winners were not phased transactions, eg 1261545532811507009 . Some phased transactions lost, eg 14736763169909938690. I'm not sure how that's possible.

I suspect from now on it'll mostly be a network speed lottery. The new client effectively means everyone has a bot. They can queue up their transaction hours in advance, and it either gets to the forger quickly enough or it doesn't. I think demand for this ICO is high enough to keep it over-subscribed for its entire run.

Thanks for the explanation.  In the transaction details for the last successful exchanges it shows a "EC Block Height" field with a value which is usually much earlier than block 1428528. What does this mean?  Is this the block when the transaction was first accepted on the network?

16
Nxt General Discussion / Re: NXT 1.11.7 Q&A
« on: August 07, 2017, 07:17:16 pm »
Total noob here.. Need it of help from you guys.

When i Submit BUY JLRDA i got notification that buy "The buy currency order has been submitted."

But i don't see it anywhere. How do i know is this submitted or not ? How to verify ? For Rate what value is recommended ?

Rate value is not changeable, so don't worry about that.
You won't see it anywhere except in `getScheduledTransactions` since it is waiting to be broadcasted.  You can find that API here: http://localhost:7876/test

what fields within that method do we need to look at to confirm it's waiting to be broadcast? Can I log off my account and keep the node running?

17
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Ignis Token Sale Progress
« on: August 07, 2017, 06:56:35 pm »
I've updated my client to the latest and submitted my order. Is preference given to when the order was submitted and will I increase my chances of the transaction being accepted if I increase the fee?

18
Nxt General Discussion / Re: Ignis Token Sale Progress
« on: August 07, 2017, 07:03:46 am »
The whale will take it all again this time. The transaction on 5 millions JLRDA is on its way...

Something went wrong this time. The whale didn't take a coin. I was able to submit an order, but it didn't went through and the coins were returned back... 1 NXT fee was taken by the system.

Same here, I submitted my order and it didn't go through but was recorded on the blockchain. I guess it didn't reach the right block in time.

19
Nxt General Discussion / Re: IGNIS logo - lets create one together!
« on: June 07, 2017, 04:46:17 pm »
In keeping with the name the logo should include the image of a spark or fire.

20
Any update on the swap procedure? Is this definitely transferring to the Waves DEX?

Pages: [1] 2 3
elective-stereophonic
elective-stereophonic
assembly
assembly