My 2NXT:
It's very sad that big shareholders render the community efforts in marketing useless. 
I must disagree here
. I can't speak for others. The only fact from the poll is that one word was choosen over the other, of the two options available.
Personally, I don't believe in sabotages coming from people who own that much at stake. If they decided to vote, at least it means that they are up to date about Nxt news, and that they've taken the time to vote.
The main problem I see is that there were just 20 votes casted. (9 voted for one option and 11 for the other). That's not even half of the people that voted at nxtforum (44). Maybe people didn't know about the poll, didn't have time to vote, didn't like the final options or... didn't care.
(By the way, even if three or four of the bigger holders that took part in that poll hadn't cast their vote, the result would have been the same.)
It's only useless if you allow them to make decisions they were never supposed to make.
Stakers secure the network, and that's *it*. That's the power they wield and all that they are given by the protocol.
I don't see bitcoin miners being asked about names of things and actually having a say by PoW for more that being able to secure things.
Miners have a lot of power. A hardfork in Bitcoin won't happen if most miners don't support it. See, for example, Bitcoin Classic or Bitcoin XT
This...
Where is other 91% of stakeholders?
