Topic: [POLL] The IPO idea. (Read 22917 times)

lurker10 · « **Reply #120 on:** March 31, 2016, 03:47:33 pm »

Quote from: Damelon on March 31, 2016, 03:41:23 pm

What you see as bullying, I see as stating a simple fact: no funding, in the end no development.

Is there anyone questioning the fact that our financial basis is shaky at best?

Is there anyone questioning that this is an issue that needs to be resolved?

If there are no funds for development this very moment, this should be stated clearly and unequivocally.
The monthly pay should be suggested and donation fund set up.

Whether there are development funds or not, what I said above still applies, the dev should NOT exert his influence and use power to sway the community in financial decisions or decide how much investors should give up of their stakes.

Brangdon · « **Reply #121 on:** March 31, 2016, 07:25:16 pm »

Quote from: Jean-Luc on March 31, 2016, 01:49:08 pm

If there is an IPO, it must be before the 2.0 platform is launched, and those investing in it should know that they are buying into something that can't be diluted in the future, i.e. the forging token.

Are you saying that the proposed IPO is not a dilution? Or are you saying there was never a promise not to dilute in the past?

Or are you saying that yes, NXT 1.0 was a forging token that was bought and sold on the understanding that its forging power would never be diluted, and that for NXT 2.0 we are going to break that promise, and that after 2.0 we will never break that promise again? Because that doesn't sound very credible.

Switch to ArdorForum

News:

Author Topic: [POLL] The IPO idea. (Read 22917 times)

lurker10

Re: [POLL] The IPO idea.

Brangdon

Re: [POLL] The IPO idea.