elective-stereophonic
elective-stereophonic
Cointelegraph: Interview with Damelon and Patrick Nosker (Vericoin) singapore
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Latest Nxt Client: Nxt 1.11.15

Author Topic: Cointelegraph: Interview with Damelon and Patrick Nosker (Vericoin)  (Read 432 times)

Damelon

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +792/-54
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2314
    • View Profile
    • Nxt Inside
Logged
Member of the Nxt Foundation | Donations: NXT-D6K7-MLY6-98FM-FLL5T
Join Nxt Slack! https://nxtchat.herokuapp.com/
Founder of Blockchain Workspace | Personal Site & Blog

lucky331

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +49/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 617
    • View Profile
Re: Cointelegraph: Interview with Damelon and Patrick Nosker (Vericoin)
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2014, 12:10:00 am »

awesome!  reading it now...  :)
Logged
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬  ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄  ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●  nimirum  ●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
▬▬▬ ◖ENDING CENSORSHIP ONLINE◗  ◖ ICO OPEN NOW◗ ▬▬▬

Tosch110

  • Ex-Staff Member
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +211/-18
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2366
    • View Profile
Re: Cointelegraph: Interview with Damelon and Patrick Nosker (Vericoin)
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2014, 12:23:44 am »

Nice one! :)

swartzfeger

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +50/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 611
  • I bent my wookie
    • View Profile
    • https://www.instagram.com/swartzfeger/
Re: Cointelegraph: Interview with Damelon and Patrick Nosker (Vericoin)
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2014, 12:25:39 am »

Damelon did an excellent job, particularly this:


Quote
I find the "bailout" argument one that clouds the issue.

The main point is that the blockchain has only legitimate way of making a decision: the stakeholders, and nothing else.So, in this case, because the community (which does not equal the stakeholders) was in uproar, the devs did the right thing by giving us the choice to vote the legitimate way:  to fork or not, and to reorg or not.Nót having done that would have been the wrong choice. It would have been a decision made by the people who aren't in charge of the chain.

So the decision "too big to fail" is still up to the stakeholders. They may very well decide to do it next time. That would still be decentralised. There is a lot of confusion on this part: decentralised does not mean morally right.

Decentralisation does not mean that we are suddenly living in paradise, it just means that the decisions are made by a majority in such a way that it cannot be gamed.Thát is the power of the blockchain.
To introduce concepts like justice or fairness into this discussion just clouds the issue of what crypto actually does.

It summarizes exactly why I was for a stakeholder reorg but not a reorg demanded by a community outcry.

A reorg can be a terrible idea and the worst of all outcomes, but shouldn't be taken off the table (this will all be moot anyway with TF, thankfully).
Logged

LiQio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Karma: +50/-5
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 672
    • View Profile
    • NxtLoader for Windows
Re: Cointelegraph: Interview with Damelon and Patrick Nosker (Vericoin)
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2014, 04:23:28 am »

Great, thanks Damelon!

Agree with swartzfeger this is the quote I would emphasize as well - and I fully agree.
 

elective-stereophonic
elective-stereophonic
assembly
assembly