MS Currency names and codes existing in Nxt 1.0 WILL be ported to the FNX Child Chain
Existing Nxt 1.0 Assets or Asset Transaction History will NOT be ported directly to the FNX Child Chain.
Why is this difference? Internally both MS and Assets are the same thing. Why have you decided to not port assets?
The key thing here is that we are talking about assets getting cloned, because the Nxt 1.0 block-chain is (as I understand it) going to be left untouched. Nothing on Nxt 1.0 will be burned or forcibly moved to 2.0. So, some assets represent IOUs and there's no point cloning them if nobody backs them. For example, cloning a Nxt 1.0 asset backed by a weight of silver won't clone the silver. Same with the digital goods store.
This doesn't explain why MS currencies
are being cloned; perhaps they just don't represent IOUs in the same way. Or perhaps they are just being treated on a par with NXT, and because NXT get cloned to FNX, MS coins get cloned too.
they decided to opt for the allocation of 50% for project development and sustainability.
Well it's 50% dilution but I can live with it.
It's complicated. It's 50% of the transactional token, so some smaller fraction of the total (forging + transactional) value of your NXT 1.0 depending on how much the forging power is worth. And it sounds like NXT 1.0 will continue running indefinitely, with nothing getting forcibly burnt on it, so arguably the 50% of FNX being held back is actually only 1/6th of the total number of coins (NXT + FXT + FNX) that we will end up with, and perhaps 1/8th of the value.
Nxt 2.0 is looking more like a new alt-coin that will co-exist with and compete with Nxt, rather than an evolution of Nxt. Since Nxt 1.0 will continue, you arguably aren't getting diluted at all. The new alt-coin doesn't owe you anything because it is new.
I've no idea how this is going to work out. With neither Assets nor Digital Goods being transferred by default, I wonder whether all the activity (such as it is) will remain with Nxt 1.0, and 2.0 will go the way of most new alt-coins. That its initial distribution is taken from Nxt 1.0 will not be seen as a good thing by outsiders.
And it's good to read that development funds will be secured. I remember I did suggest somewhere to do a 50% split in the main chain token, but preserving a 1:1 distribution on the main chain and reserving from the transactional token is a better solution.
Presumably reserving 50% of the main token would be a security/trust issue in that whoever held on to them could use them to launch a 50% attack. Owning over 50% of the transactional token has fewer, if any, security implications.