HRLTCGEAR issued 100,000,000 shares in order to ensure that we won't ever have to issue another asset, so the 35% multiplication will be no big deal to just send out as additional shares.

I agree with cexy, in that it will be nice for the investors to see the increase in their holdings (and either way will result in the same amount of dividends).

Still just waiting for LTCGEAR's payout to come through (usually they take 3-6 hours to pay everyone out)

the holdings thing is huge, since if we dont get any additional assets there will be no real increase. if everyone knows that they will get a straight 35% increase in the asset AND dividends it will encourage many more people to participate. I will not continue to hold this asset if it goes the other way however sicne it would be far more profitable for me to buy ltc2nxt.

lets use real numbers as an example. say there is asset A and B. both assets pay identical percentage dividends, (lets say 10% every time for the sake of discussion) but asset A multiplies shares and asset B just makes the shares give more dividends. we also assume that both assets have a fixed price of 1 nxt. (hrltcgear being 1 and ltc2nxt being 25 in real life, but this is irrelevant.)

Now lets invest 10,000 nxt into both a week before multiplication.

10,000 Asset A=worth 10,000 nxt with 10% weekly dividends so 1000 nxt a week

10,000 Asset B=worth 10,000 nxt with 10% weekly dividends so 1000 nxt a week

the multiplication happens and now you have

13,500 Asset A= Worth 13,500 nxt with 10% weekly dividends so 1350 nxt

10,000 Asset B= Worth 10,000 nxt with 13.5% weekly dividends so 1350 nxt a week.

So why would anyone want asset B when A is available?

in this scenario, i would sell all my asset B and buy all i could of A, get the multiplication, and then move all of the 13,500 nxt back to asset B and take advantage of the new 13.5% dividend without ever having to hold the asset when the multiplication happened. and on top of that i would have 13500 nxt to invest instead of 10,000