See what you did? You have created a loophole where "This asset is represents the right to a share in the profits from the activities of NXTinspect," becomes meaningless. You had a profit making activity -- the sale of shares -- and you decided to take a cut before you paid this money out to shareholders. You are like the director in situation D; you said you are going to take 40% of the shares and then pay profits into shares. But now you are also taking money in the company account for yourselves.
These funds and shares were moved in the IPO phase and were agreed transfers as part of the startup.
From the following sale of 50k shares there have been no transfers to the 3 of us.
We will issue accounts, in due course, although like I say we will document all transfers from the issuing account anyway
I would rather pay profits from real income than pay earlier shareholders from the sale of shares to later shareholders - I don't want to be accused of running a ponzi scheme, this is often not the intent but its very easy in this anonymous world for people to accuse.
Regarding burn rate - the background burn rate will be as close to zero as I can get it by reusing the NXT infrastructure, partners who benefit from having the information and established free-to-customer channels.. our costs will be activity based for peoples time and those costs will be contingent in those activities bringing in revenue.
EDIT: I will have some minimal NXT transaction costs so the sooner those fees are lowered the better

if the venture folds then any residual value in the accounts will be transferred to assets holders but failure is not our intention.