Print

• Show the most recent posts.

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[landomata]

I don't think its a good idea for those who issue Assets to own any part of NXTinspect.


Thats just my personal opinion.

[rlh]

I don't think its a good idea for those who issue Assets to own any part of NXTinspect.


Thats just my personal opinion.

I see your point, but I don't quite agree.  Assets can own this asset, however, if someone requests a report of their portfolio, and it's holdings, any asset that holds NXTinspect should have a specially deaignsted line item stating their ownership, and the size of their stake.

In other words, let the asset managers be free to invest in what they see as profitable, but most certainly let the investors know about their involvment so that they can make educated choices.

IMHO, if NXTinspect doesn't do this, it could tarnish the public perspective of the company.  It's not a requirement but it would be VERY good form.

[TwinWinNerD]

Just require every asset to put in a public disclaimer stating their relationship with the 3guys.

Like this:

The CEO of the asset owns 10% of NXTinspect and is best buddies with Chanc3r and whale.

[whale]

I don't think its a good idea for those who issue Assets to own any part of NXTinspect.


Thats just my personal opinion.

I see your point, but I don't quite agree.  Assets can own this asset, however, if someone requests a report of their portfolio, and it's holdings, any asset that holds NXTinspect should have a specially deaignsted line item stating their ownership, and the size of their stake.

In other words, let the asset managers be free to invest in what they see as profitable, but most certainly let the investors know about their involvment so that they can make educated choices.

IMHO, if NXTinspect doesn't do this, it could tarnish the public perspective of the company.  It's not a requirement but it would be VERY good form.

Agreed. Basically you're looking for a disclaimer from the author on their personal involvement with the asset?

[hisun]

I am organizing a coalition opposed to 777, 777 issued so many assets, but did not come out any outcome, each asset has no substantial progress, there is no complete progress reports. The existence of 777 large asset bubbles, without any support industrial entities, nor any product delivery.
Should at least give investors a promise, when to complete the product.
Month issued a five assets, what time you can complete these projects do? Have you considered it?

Took the investors' money, buy all nxtinspect, to finally harm the interests of investors. We could 1nxt buy nxtinspect, now 5nxt. 777 took the majority of investors' money, in the end harm the interests of investors. We have to stand up firmly opposed.

Here, I begged a rational view of the majority of investors assets. Why require such a high valuation.

Should we set up a committee of investors, for investors to speak?

Otherwise, the market will not be sustainable.

Please seriously consider, NXT future.

[trollstocker]

Please tell me you're joking!?
Welcome to the decentralized market trading an asset is worth what people are willing to pay for it..and SuperNet is still in Diapers only weeks old..I am very excited as to what is going on here..If you chose not to keep up with all the goings on here,don't complain because you missed the boat on nxtinspect...by the way people are chewing up the 5 wall as we speak
..IMO it is still cheap all you have to do is sit back and think for a minute where it could be in a year from now!

[chanc3r]

Been offline all day and just seen you lot ate the 50k buy wall @5 NXT ....
Humbled by the faith some of you have in us but please don't pay silly prices for this it won't make us work harder to make more money to justify the price you paid.
We haven't made any money yet!

re: some of the posts;

On the subject of 'who am i' - I've been around NXT since last December - published my BIO before - look it up.
If you don't trust us, don't invest and don't use the 'paid for' version of the service when we launch.

BTW I don't have any friends when it comes to business so 'best mates' does not apply.

Oh and we don't have ANY partners - thought I would correct that impression!

24h early access to new asset listings was a confused post as stated previously - please wait for the correct information to be published.

Some early clarification points - if a report is paid for by the asset issuer then this will be stated.
if an analyst has a conflict of interest - we will pick another analyst or declare it
if a report is paid for by the asset issuer or another sponsor this will be clear at publication that this is sponsored and how.
if an asset issuer has bought some NXTinspect assets - i don't care it does not buy any special treatment regarding the content of any reports produced.

For example I hold 2.3k super net bought with my own NXT, would I review SuperNET and criticise it if necessary - yes I would - the conflict is if I sell 2.3k assets before I  publish the report.. (and charge a fee for the report)
I could use my skills to decide it was time to get out and not write anything...

I am a founder of DORCSGAMES and in this case I could not be objective in a review, neither could Jeff but I believe whale would not pull any punches...

hopefully this provides some answers.

[printshop]

Oh and we don't have ANY partners - thought I would correct that impression!

Thanks for the clarifications, but this one is confusing. Aren't you partering with SuperNET, NXTreporting, and BOOST? Did you exit the partnerships?

[chanc3r]

Oh and we don't have ANY partners - thought I would correct that impression!

Thanks for the clarifications, but this one is confusing. Aren't you partering with SuperNET, NXTreporting, and BOOST? Did you exit the partnerships?

Ah I see what you mean now I thought you means partners 'IN" NXTinspect as in 'with influence' - we don't have any of these is what I mean.

These are all 'partners' in the context that they will utilise NXTinspect services and full details of how and what will be disclosed.

[jefdiesel]

Oh and we don't have ANY partners - thought I would correct that impression!

Thanks for the clarifications, but this one is confusing. Aren't you partering with SuperNET, NXTreporting, and BOOST? Did you exit the partnerships?

We have 'signed' strategic partnerships to provide reports for the above listed.
We expect to issue weekly reports on SuperNet holdings, and are working with NXTreporting to include our information on the asset listing pages on their site.

[cc001]

and are working with NXTreporting to include our information on the asset listing pages on their site.

it will be very cool!

[whale]

Oh and we don't have ANY partners - thought I would correct that impression!

Thanks for the clarifications, but this one is confusing. Aren't you partering with SuperNET, NXTreporting, and BOOST? Did you exit the partnerships?

Ah I see what you mean now I thought you means partners 'IN" NXTinspect as in 'with influence' - we don't have any of these is what I mean.

These are all 'partners' in the context that they will utilise NXTinspect services and full details of how and what will be disclosed.

Partners as in business relationships, not investors. I think you need to clarify this in your post.

[CRServers]

I don't think its a good idea for those who issue Assets to own any part of NXTinspect.
Thats just my personal opinion.

This makes sense to me too.
If the purpose of NXTinspect is to provide an unbiased evaluation on assets to the potential investors.
"Credibility" has to be the biggest asset of NXTinspect
IMHO

[nxtfan]

Could you please also issue VPNInspect service&asset ?

[tank]

look at this pic,about 90% is Community' asset or james' asset, but community is too small for the world.
The outside world is very exciting, there are too many good projects need financing,those who have a good product but lack of funds,Crowdfunding is a good application in cryptocurrency.
so nxt AE has great potential and NXTinspect will play an important role in the process.

[skywave]

can you only buy NXTinspect from the NXT AE - are they also on an external exchange? (when they will become available that is )

[chanc3r]

can you only buy NXTinspect from the NXT AE - are they also on an external exchange? (when they will become available that is )

because we are on NXT AE then I would hope we will be listed on SecureAE at some point where you can buy with BTC, I will discuss with the guys whether we can get on poloniex or BTER...

tbh i hadn't thought the market cap of NXTinspect would be big enough to warrant this and it may not be.. but SecureAE should definitely be possible.

[spring]

I get 3 NXTinspect while my account have 48 superNet, does that mean the proportion is 1:16?

[valarmg]

I get 3 NXTinspect while my account have 48 superNet, does that mean the proportion is 1:16?

Yes.

Details of SuperNET dividends:
https://nxtforum.org/general-discussion/supernetwork-ipopoloniex/msg111763/#msg111763

Details of NxtVenture dividends:
https://nxtforum.org/nxtventures/nxtventure-the-way-for-the-most-promising-enterprises-to-get-ae-listing/msg111749/#msg111749

[LibertyNow]

So what's the timeframe on when the first report will be out?